66. The passage shows that .
C
2016_北京卷 (英语)
66. The passage shows that .
C
【考点】OA:健康环保类阅读;P1:内容归纳;P2:文中细节.菁优网版权所有
【分析】 本文主要介绍了科学家拯救美国加利福尼亚鹰的两种方法:一种是通过
对电的感应的训练;另一种是将严重铅中毒的鹰送往洛杉矶动物园用依地酸二钠
钙(一种能溶解铅的化学物质) 进行治疗.此外,本文还提到环境对加利福尼亚
鹰的危害以及加利福尼亚鹰正急剧减少并濒临灭绝的状况.
【解答】DBDC
63.D 推理判断题.由文章第一段内容可知,In the 1980s, electrical lines and lead
poisoning(铅中毒)nearly drove them to dying out. 加利福尼亚鹰是北美最大的
鸟,但在20世纪80年代几乎濒临灭绝.可见拯救加利福尼亚鹰的形势之危急,
因此可以推知"引起科学家关注的原因是D”.答案为D.
64.B 细节理解题.由第一段In the 1980s, electrical lines and lead poisoning(铅
中毒)nearly drove them to dying out. 可知,导致加利福尼亚鹰濒临灭绝的原因有
两个,其中之一是electrical lines(电线),由此可推出答案B.
65.D 细节理解题.细节可以在文中第四段查找."they absorb large quantities of
lead. This affects their nervous systems and ability to produce baby birds, and can
lead to kidney(肾)failures and death."可知影响生育.因此选D.
【答案】C
【解析】推理判断题.A错误,加利福尼亚鹰存活数量少,B错误,科学家团队的
研究爱好不是在电力工程上,D错误,研究者并未找到最后的解决办法,由句子
Although these measures are not effective forever…可知, 现在的办法并不是永久的
办法. 因此选C. 由第四段The annual death rate for adult condors has dropped from
38% in 2000 to 5.4% in 2011.和最后一段the California condors’ average survival
time in the wild is now just under eight years可知,取得了良好的效果.
【点评】 作答本题,考生需在文中着重抓住细节信息.在综合细节的基础上进行
判断,在文中找到信息.
D
Why College Is Not Home
The college years are supposed to be a time for important growth in autonomy
(自主性)and the development of adult identity. However, now they are becoming
an extended period of adolescence, during which many of today’s students and are not
shouldered with adult responsibilities.
For previous generations, college was decisive break from parental control;
guidance and support needed help from people of the same age and from within. In
the past two decades, however, continued connection with and dependence on family,
thanks to cell phones, email and social media, have increased significantly. Some
parents go so far as to help with coursework. Instead of promoting the idea of college
as a passage from the shelter of the family to autonomy and adult responsibility,
universities have given in to the idea that they should provide the same environment
as that of the home.
To prepare for increased autonomy and responsibility, college needs to be a time
of exploration and experimentation. This process involves “trying on” new ways of
thinking about oneself bother intellectually(在思维方面)and personally. While we
should provide “safe spaces” within colleges, we must also make it safe to express
opinions and challenge majority views. Intellectual growth and flexibility are fostered
on debate and questioning.
Learning to deal with the social world is equally important. Because a college
community(群体)differs from the family, many students will struggle to find a
sense of belonging. If students rely on administrators to regulate their social behavior
and thinking pattern, they are not facing the challenge of finding an identity within a
larger and complex community.
Moreover, the tendency for universities to monitor and shape student behavior
runs up against another characteristic of young adults: the response to being
controlled by their elders. If acceptable social behavior is too strictly defined (规定)
and controlled, the insensitive or aggressive behavior that administrators are seeking
to minimize may actually be encouraged.
It is not surprising that young people are likely to burst out, particularly when
there are reasons to do so. Our generation once joined hands and stood firm at times
of national emergency. What is lacking today is the conflict between adolescent’s
desire for autonomy and their understanding of an unsafe world. Therefore, there is
the desire for their dorms to be replacement homes and not places to experience
intellectual growth.
Every college discussion about community values, social climate and behavior
should include recognition of the developmental importance of student autonomy and
self-regulation, of the necessary tension between safety and self-discovery.